|




















|
|
 |
|
Classified Staff
Advisory Council |

Patrick Kass, Director of Parking & Transportation, Speaks with Classified Staff
Notes from
Patrick Kass' Presentation
12/2/08 - Main Library
Power-Pt. Presentation

Comments posed on the
parking issue:
I am writing to
protest, in the strongest possible terms, the parking
rate hikes recently approved by your office. Parking on
campus already costs more than our medical insurance.
That makes no sense. With these rate hikes, within the
next four years, parking will cost more than double our
health insurance.
Ostensibly, these
rate increases are meant to encourage faculty and staff
to use alternate methods of transportation. I applaud
the concept and would be delighted to do so if the
demands of my job made it possible. However, my duties
cannot be completed within a standard 40 hour week under
ordinary circumstances. With the upcoming staff cuts
and recent salary lines sweeps, I can only envision my
workload increasing.
Carpooling
is out of the question when my work hours are erratic
due to excessive workload and sudden campus crises.
Additionally, my duties include responsibility for
shopping for events both on and off campus, meeting with
vendors for events venues, and setting up events at a
variety of locations. All of these require that I use
my personal vehicle (for which I receive no
reimbursement) and consistently require that I do so
outside of standard working hours (for which I'm also
not paid, being 'exempt'). Am I to work until 7:00 or
7:30pm, ride the bus and walk home, pick up my car, and
then go out to do these work-related errands? That
would increase my work day and decrease my time at home
with my family significantly. I already spend far more
time working than I do at home.
Aside
from the considerations listed above, there are no
raises in sight and the cost of living has increased
dramatically. These rate hikes put an undue burden on
the staff who are facing increasing demands in terms of
workload and who are finding it more and more difficult
to make ends meet in a state with one of the highest
mortgage failure rates in the nation.
When Parking &
Transportation proposed their rate increases, they cited
peer institutions; what they did not cite was the number
of universities who don't charge staff for parking or
who charge only nominal fees, of which there are a
number. Further, I do not recall any invitation for
staff to provide input on this decision; rather the
announcement appeared as a fait accompli. Public
meetings are to be scheduled after the fact which does
not seem to give us an opportunity to participate in the
process. Additionally, a major focus of the rate
increase is to fund new garage construction. If we are
truly trying to encourage alternate methods of
transportation, why should we pay more so this
'self-sustaining unit' can build more garages when
garage use should decrease with more people using
alternate means of transportation?
Finally, safety is a
huge concern on campus but it is not addressed here. I
frequently leave campus after 7:30pm. Due to my erratic
hours, I would be forced to use public transportation
which would have me walking a minimum of 1/2 mile from
the bus stop, by myself, sometime around 8:15-8:30pm. I
feel that this would put me at grave personal risk.
I strongly urge you
to reconsider your decision to approve the rate
increases for parking and open the issue up to
campus-wide discussion. Thank you for
your consideration.
* * *
When an organization reserves spots
in the garages, is the garage reserved for the whole day for
those spots or just for the time period requested? It seems that
the garage as a whole is completely reserved quite often. Do
they really need it for the whole day?? Do they reserve only
what they need or do they pad their numbers by a lot? I believe
that they reserve much more than what is really needed. They
also need more help at the cashiers window. They other night at
6pm the line of people was very long with only one cashier and
the gates were not working properly so there also was a huge
back up of cars. A big mess for 6pm on a Monday.
Garage reservations may be
for the entire day, however, when possible we will open the
garage for visitors after the event ends. Departments pay a
cost per space for the reservations, so it is improbable that
they would “pad” their numbers, although there have been times
that the number of guest has been overestimated.
We now regularly staff the
Second Street Garage with a second cashier and the other garages
as needed. We are currently analyzing date from our new parking
management system to try and better manage the peak times.
* * *
How can Parking & Transportation (P&T)
justify this type of increase, (although recently
amended for the first year) when there have not been any
significant employee related raises and none seen in the
near future. For zone 1 lot holders, we are looking at
a $300 increase, and for what? Really
We have many employees still making
under $25K a year, some who may lose their home, etc.
How can you put such a burden on these employees when
they are here to benefit The University of Arizona?
Maybe to some this increase is just a
drop in the bucket and won’t even blink an eye, but to
some it is a burden and you need to know that. In the
past students, faculty, and employees could park in the
surrounding streets for free but the City of Tucson took
that away years ago.
P&T tells us that they are self
sustained which is one of the reasons for the increase.
P&T does not pay for utilities or taxes for the property
they are on, if they do please let us know what is the
cost?
In my own opinion P&T benefits greatly
from regular parking customers; visitors who purchase
passes or park in garages; vendors who purchase permits;
special events paid for by other departments; citations;
meter costs. Then you have sports events, oh yeah,
reserved spaces, more money!
Parking meters alone cost .25cents for
every 15 minutes, what a kill. When I started working,
meters were .25cents for every ½ hour and it changed not
too long after that, wow! What a profit. In downtown you
can park at meters for up to an hour on one quarter.
It seems that nobody looks at the big
picture when it relates the construction of new
buildings and lots and how will these affect traffic
flow once built? Trying to get out of the area around
Cherry, Helen, Mountain at the end of the day can be a
nightmare. People exiting the Highland Garage and Zone
1 lots to the south get into real traffic jams,
especially with the pedestrian walkways. I believe more
stop signs are needed so that traffic will flow more
smoothly thus reducing the chance of accidents with
vehicles and/or pedestrians. I’m not sure where the
responsibility lands when it comes to U of A owned
streets and City of Tucson owned streets.
With the increase in parking at the U
of A, nothing has been done to the parking lots and
surrounding areas with regards to wear and tear. Lots
are not re-paved only re-stripped, potholes are not
fixed, and flooding is still an issue at many parking
areas.
We have been hearing about new
programs for ever. Although we complete the required
Pima Government travel survey, I have not seen much
change. The only thing that has been added is
designated carpool spaces which are very rarely used.
Care share, what is this?
I read that P&T wants to develop
system where employees who ride bus, or park in Park and
Ride lots can rent U of A vehicles to run errands. If
true, more profit for P&T and will require more space to
keep such vehicles.
I believe that The University of
Arizona Parking & Transportation needs to work more
closely with the City of Tucson and Suntran to develop a
system for University students, faculty and staff.
New garage construction is expensive.
Garages are more dangerous, promote theft and damage to cars
is inevitable. Maybe you don’t need a $15 million dollar
garage. Need to re-think garage construction.
As an auxiliary
enterprise, PTS does pay an Administrative Service Charge to
cover the cost of utilities and other services provided by
the University. This will cost $1.2 Million this year. We do
not receive any state funding. We set our rates in
compliance with University policy to cover only the cost of
operating the department, including infrastructure
improvements such as new lots and garages. We must charge
users in order to pay for parking garages and lots, shuttle
service and Federal and State mandated alternative
transportation activities. It takes over $14 million to
provide these services to the campus community.
New garages must be built
to maintain the current parking ratio of 1 space for every 4
people on campus. New building construction will take away
hundreds of parking spaces in the future and these must be
replaced to accommodate a reasonable number of parkers on
campus. The balance is the alternative transportation
programs to help the others get to campus and these must be
funded.
Parking and Transportation created a model type that
addressed the cost of the different travel methods of
students and employees of the UA. The model states that the
annual cost of someone driving alone everyday, assuming that
gas is about $2.00 a gallon, comes to an astounding $ 1343.
If people plan on carpooling to and from campus, that lowers
the cost substantially to $ 446 if there are three people in
the car. But the most budget minded means of transportation
is the Sun Tran bus pass. The bus pass for a year comes to a
cost of $ 275. For information on comparing costs to
commute to and from the UA campus by transportation mode
type, please visit:
http://parking.arizona.edu/programchanges/index.php?ccc=1#ccc
. This chart compares daily and annual expenses for a Sun
Tran Bus Pass, Carpooling, Park & Ride Lots and Driving
Alone to and from campus. Check out which mode of
transportation best fits your needs!
* * *
I work in the College of Medicine and would
like to find out about the new parking structure that is going
to be built in the UPH parking lot. Many of us here at the COM
would gladly pay to park in that structure since parking here is
not the best. I come in when it is dark and many times leave
when it is dark. There are meetings off campus and parking is
difficult to say the least. The Highland Garage is not a good
parking situation for us at the COM.
The new garage on Ring Road will be operated by UMC.
Unfortunately, at this time, they are projecting that it will be
used to capacity by UMC staff members. Long range plans include
an additional parking garage to be located near Helen and
Campbell to increase parking access near AHSC. We are also
going to be converting a portion of the large surface lot west
of the hospital over to UA parking.
* * *
With the price of parking increasing, can we
be more creative with parking passes? For example, sell parking
permits that are good for 3 days a week or 2 days a week
("fractional parking permits")? I would gladly use the bus SOME
of the time, but with appointments, errands to run before/after
work or at lunch, it's unrealistic for me to go without driving
to UA completely. Some California university campuses offer
this. It would be helpful to employees, and probably overall the
dept would make more money for the effort. Could this idea be
investigated for UA?
We are investigating these types of permits and hope to be able
to offer these at some time in the future. We are moving toward
prepaid garage parking that will be offered at a discount.
* * *
Regarding parking permit increases. I think
we need to understand the stated purpose of the increases in
parking fees: to get people to think twice about parking on
campus, to get people to carpool, walk or ride and to understand
that the priority is parking for students. When I bought my
house, I consciously looked for a house close enough to bike if
necessary, on a bus route and less than 5 miles away!
Agreed! Keep in mind the other half of the equation is that we
presently offer about one space for every four people on
campus. We want to maintain that ratio, so we do need to build
new parking as new construction of campus buildings occurs on
the surface parking lots.
* * *
I would like to express my great concern
about the increase in parking fees. First of all, I
think this is absolutely outrageous. I feel that the
comparison made didn't take into account the economic
factors of who they compared us to. I do not have an
alternate transportation option as I work 7:30am - 4:30pm
which is different from most other people. In addition
I have a weekly meeting for which I need to leave campus
on my lunch hour every Tuesday, and I need to have a
reasonable way of not making this a two hour event
because of parking issues. I also have children that I
need to drop off and pick up before and after work so
the more time it takes to park the worse it is for them
too. Public transportation from the far Southwest side
of town is nonexistent and to park and ride would take
me 2 hours and 20 minutes one way. It irritates me that
most of the first floor of the parking garage is take up
by student vehicles that hardly move. I've seen cars in
the same exact spot for several days without moving.
Why not make students park on the outskirts of campus
and give priority parking to the people who need to come
and go everyday. I also think that in a recession when
people are loosing their jobs, even if it's not the UofA
employee it might be their family member, this is not
the time to be making such huge hikes in the rates. In
addition, there are other ways of making money without
gouging employees, for example, raise the parking fines!
If you raised the parking fines and just ticked the
people in the 20 minute parking spots who park for class
and the speeders in the parking garage, you could make
lots of extra money. In addition with all the budget
cuts I highly doubt that we will be getting a pay
increase anytime soon, which makes the parking hike even
worse, this means that now instead of just not getting
ahead with all the increases in parking and health insurance etc, we will now be losing
money.
* * *
In reference to the parking situation, I believe
that Parking and Transportation should do more to
encourage ride-sharing or car-pooling. I ride-share
with 2 other U of A staff and we now have a
ride-share parking space and split the cost. We
also save a lot of money on gasoline and mileage on
our autos. We have been trying to get a 4th person
but are limited in how we contact other staff of the
U of A to let them know we have this spot
available. We meet at the Desert Diamond Casino
parking lot in Sahuarita. The problem with the Pima
County website for ride-share is it gives you names
of individuals who work in places other than the
University - which is just not convenient. We sent
emails to our working areas, but we do not have
access to a "university-wide" email that would reach
all staff that live in the Sahuarita/Green Valley
area. If Parking and Transportation had something
set up on their website so that people interested in
car-pooling could contact people who live in their area that would be a huge help. It
would also be beneficial if ride-share was "advertised"
more and the benefits of saving gasoline, etc. were "out
there" for people to start thinking along these lines
and get more car pools going. It would be interesting
to know how many car pools are now recognized at the U
of A and have a campaign to increase these numbers. It
is time to push this and I don't think Parking and
Transportation is doing enough to connect people for
this effort.
The University controls access to email lists for
privacy reasons. Those who wish to sign up for Car
Share should go to
www.pagnet.org/rs/carpool/ . This site will
provide email addresses of those signed up in your
area. It will include potential matches of
employees of nearby businesses, but if you can
simply choose not to contact those people if you do
not want to. If you only want to University
employees to respond, note that in the comment
section.
We will look at providing a university only ride
matching program on our website. We do not want to
duplicate an already existing program at PAG, but
will determine whether it makes sense to have and
maintain our own.
Our last survey indicated that about 10% of our
employees carpooled at least some of the time.
We agree that more education and publicity about
these programs will make them more successful. We
will continue to let people know as best we can via
press releases, mailing, emails, and other creative
ways. We hope that you will also help us spread the
word!
* * *
Is anything being done to deter
vehicle theft from the parking garages? I work in a
small unit in which 2 co-worker's vehicles were stolen
within a 7 month period (7/06-2/07). I was told the UA
would not install security cameras due to potential
liability issues. I don't understand the issue since we
pay to park at our own risk. I have purchased the Club
from Parking & Transportation but that's not the
answer. In Main Gate garage, the cashier booth is
positioned by one of the entrances not the exit. It's
not acceptable to say that since we live so close to
Mexico that we just have to learn to live with it.
Parking & Transportation
Services (PTS) employs 4 full time employees to patrol the garages.
Their main purpose is to observe the garage for potential
issues—crime, suspicious persons, accidents, unlawful movements, and
illegal parking. UAPD also regularly patrols the garages.
UAPD relies upon the
general public to be aware of their surroundings and to notify
them when anything suspicious or unusual is noticed. We
encourage everyone to be vigilant for anything out of the
ordinary and report it to UAPD. With everyone’s help, we can
make the campus safer.
PTS works closely with UAPD to help prevent theft and all crime
in all of our lots and garages and throughout campus. We have
many employees around campus we have given them all the task to
keep their eyes open for suspicious activity and to notify UAPD
to check it out.
We also have four full time safety officers who patrol the
garages.
We realize that this is an open campus in an urban environment
and this makes crime nearly inevitable. However, as noted
above, by working together, in the nature of true “Community
Policing” and reporting suspicious people, hiding valuables,
watching out for your neighbor’s belongings, we can drastically
reduce the amount of crime. UAPD targets specific areas if they
notice an increase in reported crimes, both through undercover
operations and extra patrols. So, although we hope it never
happens, please report all crimes to UAPD.
The Club is very helpful and is a deterrent to car theft. It is
not foolproof, however, a car thief is very likely to see it in
your car and decide to go to elsewhere. We do sell steering
wheel locks on behalf of UAPD in our office.
* * *
When they did the parking fee survey, did they also do a
wage and salary survey of the same institutions? I
don't think it is right if they want to charge us
parking fees similar to ASU unless they are willing to
pay us at the same wage/salary rates.
We did not do a wage or salary survey. We based our
increases on the cost of maintaining our number of
parking spaces and providing alternatives to those who
wish to use them.
What has Parking and Transportation done and what
will they be doing to cut expenses? They shouldn't
expect us to make sacrifices (excessive increase in
parking fees) to support their unit unless they have
also made sacrifices.
PTS continuously looks at ways to save money. We have
eliminated several positions and do not fill vacant
spots without consideration of the usefulness of the
position and whether we can do without it. We have
filled full-time positions with part time student
employees where possible—we now have 49 student and
on-call employees, which is about 29% of our employees.
We use academic employees where possible and contract
services when it’s possible to save money by doing so.
We do our own maintenance. We have traded in many of
our trucks for golf carts which are not only cheaper to
purchase, but are cheaper to operate. We have also
automated many of our services. Automation allows us to
use fewer personnel.
* * *
While in theory I don't have a problem
with the increase, but to the extent that daily I see
the CatTrans numerous time with the average passenger
load of 3 people - seems that that P&T could look at
reducing their own area before just pushing it all on
the Faculty, Students and Staff. Also why is it
necessary to sweep the streets on a daily basis - that
seems to be another way to cut back. P & T needs to be a
"team" with the campus not the parking police.
CatTran transported nearly
half of a million passengers last year. We have the
second largest transit system in Southern Arizona (only
SunTran is larger). One of the options we are promoting
for cheaper parking is the off-campus parking with
shuttle service to campus. More cars off campus will
increase ridership both from the off-campus lots and on
the intra campus routes.
Facilities Maintenance
sweeps the streets.
PTS will continue to do
all we can to assure that Faculty, Staff, Students, and
Visitors have access to campus. Part of what we do is
to insure that those who invest in a parking permit are
able to park in their assigned areas. This requires
that we enforce the parking regulations. We will
continue to do so.
* * *
Who is given free parking in
the parking garages?
No one specifically
receives free parking in the garages--even President
Club member permits are paid for. Retirees do
presently receive a free permit for zoned surface
areas, but disabled retirees may access garages for
free in order to have proximate parking. There is
one group that gets free access in and out of the
garages at any time—UAPD. We think it’s very
important that the police patrol inside the garages
regularly so each police cruiser has full access to
the garages.
In the comparisons used to
determine the upcoming increases, what is the
percentage of the staff's gross wages
attributable for parking; i.e. what percentage
of an administrative assistant's wages at Wells
Fargo, or UC Berkeley or Ohio State is spent on
garage parking as compared to the same level of
administrative assistant at the University of
Arizona?
We did not use this
comparison to set rates. The chart only compares our
rates to others as a benchmarking tool. The
increase was determined by the amount of funding
needed for new programs and future new garage
construction to replace lost parking spaces. We
want to provide alternatives that allow people to
make a choice about how much they want to spend for
access to campus. From free—a bus pass (in a couple
of years, but subsidized up to 50% right now) or
biking to parking off campus to three levels of
parking on campus. However, we did an analysis
adjusting permit prices based on the cost of living
index for the city where each institution is located
and the relative position of our permit prices to
the others did not substantially change. Most UA staff members, if they
are not part of the reduction in force, will
probably not receive even a cost-of-living
increase. Contributions to benefits have
increased and parking has increased. Staff
members are taking less home with each increase,
which means less disposable income to infuse
into the economy, therefore contributing to the
downward spiral of the economy. With all of the
brilliant minds on this campus (and I mean that
sincerely--not sarcastically), there ought to be
a more creative solution.
We will be offering
people alternatives that will cost less than what
they are paying now. We understand that some won’t
be as convenient, or even possible, for some people,
but most people will have options that they can use
that will cost less than they presently pay for
parking. They will, of course, still be able to
choose to pay for parking as well on a permit
available basis. Also, since parking is a pre-tax
benefit, next years increase will be less than $2
per pay period.
For more
information contact
SAC
|
|
|
|
 Maintained by
Communications Committee
SAC Tel: (520) 621-3931
|
|